BOOK
ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENT
FEATURES, METHODS, AND
STRUCTURES
INVESTMENT STRUCTURES |
Video covering this content is |
LOS 76.a: Describe features and categories of alternative
investments. |
available
online. |
|
MODULE 76.1: ALTERNATIVE
Alternative investments comprise various types of
investments that do not fall under the heading of traditional investments,
which refers to long-only investments in cash or publicly traded stocks and
bonds.
Types of alternative investment structures include hedge
funds, private equity funds, and various types of real estate investments.
Alternative investments typically are actively managed and may include
investments in commodities, infrastructure, and illiquid securities.
The perceived bene its of including alternative investments
in portfolios are risk reduction from diversi ication (due to low correlations
of alternative investments with traditional investments) and possible higher
returns from holding illiquid securities, and from markets for some alternative
investments possibly being less ef icient than those for traditional
investments.
Compared with traditional investments, alternative
investments typically exhibit the following features:
More
specialized knowledge required of investment managers
Relatively low correlations with returns of traditional
investments
Less liquidity of assets held
Longer time horizons for investors
Larger size of investment commitments
As a result of these unique features, alternative
investments exhibit the following characteristics:
Investment structures that facilitate direct
investment by managers
Information asymmetry between fund managers
and investors, which funds typically address by means of incentive-based fee
structures
Dif iculty in appraising performance, such as
more problematic and less available historical returns and volatility data
Although correlations of returns on alternative investments
with returns on traditional investments may be low on average, these
correlations may increase signi icantly during periods of economic stress.
We will examine several types of alternative investments in
detail in separate readings in this topic area. We may classify alternative investments
into three broad categories of private capital, real assets, and hedge funds.
1. Private capital includes private equity and
private debt:
– As the name suggests, private equity funds invest in the equity of
companies that are not publicly traded, or in the equity of publicly traded
irms that the funds intend to take private. These irms are often in the mature
or decline stages of their industry life cycle. Leveraged buyout (LBO) funds use borrowed money to purchase
equity in established companies and comprise most private equity investment
funds. Venture capital funds invest in young, unproven companies at the
start-up or early stages in their life cycles.
– Private debt funds may make loans directly to
companies, lend to early-stage irms (venture
debt), or invest in the debt of irms that are struggling to make their debt
payments or have entered bankruptcy (distressed debt).
2. Real assets include real estate,
infrastructure, natural resources, and other assets such as digital assets:
– Real estate investments include residential or commercial
properties, as well as real estate– backed debt. These investments are held in
various structures, including full or leveraged ownership of individual
properties, individual real estate–backed loans, private and publicly traded
securities backed by pools of properties or mortgages, and limited
partnerships.
– Natural resources include commodities,
farmland, and timberland. To gain exposure to commodities, investors can own physical commodities, commodity
derivatives, or the equity of commodity-producing irms. Some funds seek
exposure to the returns on various commodity indices, often by holding
derivatives contracts (futures) that are expected to track a speci ic commodity
index. Farmland can produce income
from leasing the land out for farming or from raising crops or livestock for
harvest and sale. Timberland
investment involves purchasing forested land and harvesting trees to generate
cash lows.
– Infrastructure refers to
long-lived assets that provide public services. These include economic
infrastructure assets (e.g., roads, airports, and utility grids) and social
infrastructure assets (e.g., schools and hospitals). While often inanced and
constructed by government entities, infrastructure investments have more recently
been undertaken by public-private partnerships, with each holding a
signi icant stake in the infrastructure assets. Various deal structures are
employed, and the asset may revert to public ownership at some future date.
– Other types of real assets include collectibles such as art,
intangible assets such as patents, anddigital assets such as cryptocurrencies.
3. Hedge funds are investment companies
typically open only to quali ied investors. These funds may use leverage, hold
long and short positions, use derivatives, and invest in illiquid assets.
Managers of hedge funds use many different strategies in attempting to generate
investment gains. They do not necessarily hedge risk, as the name might imply.
LOS 76.b: Compare direct investment, co-investment, and fund investment methods for alternative investments.
Fund investing refers to investing in a pool of
assets alongside other investors, using a fund manager who selects and manages
a pool of investments using an agreed-upon strategy. In this case, the
individual investors do not control the selection of assets for investment or
their subsequent management and sale. The manager typically receives a
percentage of the investable funds (management fee) as well as a percentage of
the investment gains (incentive fee).
Compared to funds that invest in traditional asset classes,
alternative investment funds typically require investors to commit larger
amounts of capital for longer periods, provide less information on positions
held and returns earned, and charge higher management fees. A fund’s term sheet
describes its investment policy, fee structure, and requirements for investors
to participate.
With co-investing,
an investor contributes to a pool of investment funds (as with fund investing)
but also has the right to invest, directly alongside the fund manager, in some
of the assets in which the manager invests. Compared to fund investing,
co-investing can reduce overall fees while bene iting from the manager’s
expertise. Co-investing also can provide an investor with an opportunity to
gain the skills and experience to pursue direct investing. For a fund manager,
permitting co-investment may increase the availability of investment funds and
expand the scope and diversi ication of the fund’s investments.
Direct investing refers to an investor
that purchases assets itself, rather than pooling its funds with others or
using a specialized outside manager. Larger, more knowledgeable investors may
purchase private companies or real estate directly. For example, a sovereign
wealth fund may have its own specialized managers to invest in real estate,
agricultural land, or companies in the venture stage.
Direct investing has advantages in
that there are no fees to outside managers, and the investor has more control
over investment choices. Disadvantages include the possibility of less diversi
ication across investments, higher minimum investment amounts, and greater
investor expertise required to evaluate deals and perform their own due
diligence.
LOS 76.c: Describe investment ownership and compensation structures commonly used in alternative investments.
Alternative investments are often structured as limited partnerships.
In a limited partnership, the general partner (GP)
is the fund manager and makes all the investment decisions. The limited partners (LPs) are the investors, who own a
partnership share proportional to their investment amounts. The LPs typically
have no say in how the fund is managed and no liability beyond their investment
in the partnership. The GP takes on the liabilities of the partnership,
including the repayment of any partnership debt. Partnerships typically set a
maximum number of LPs that may participate.
LPs commit to an investment amount, and in some cases, they
only contribute a portion of that initially, providing the remaining funds over
time as required by the GP (as fund investments are made). General partnerships
are less regulated than publicly traded companies, and limited partnership
shares are typically only available to accredited
investors—those with suf icient wealth to bear signi icant risk and enough
investment sophistication to understand the risks.
The rules and operational details that govern a partnership
are contained in the limited partnership agreement. Special terms that
apply to one limited partner but not to others can be stated in side letters.
For example, an LP might negotiate an excusal
right to withhold a capital contribution that the GP would otherwise
require. Some limited partners may require that special terms offered to other
LPs also be offered to them. This is known as a most-favored-nation clause
in a side letter.
While most alternative investment limited partnership
holdings are illiquid, a fund may be structured as a master limited partnership (MLP) that can be publicly traded. Master limited partnerships
are most common in funds that specialize in natural resources or real estate.
Fee Structures
The total fees paid by investors in alternative investment
funds often consist of a management fee, typically between 1% and 2%
of the fund’s assets, and a performance fee or incentive fee (sometimes
referred to as carried interest).
The fund manager earns the management fee, regardless of
investment performance. For hedge funds, the management fees are calculated as
a percentage of assets under management (AUM), typically the net asset value of
the fund’s investments. For private equity funds, the management fee is
calculated as a percentage of committed capital, not invested capital.
Committed capital is typically not all invested immediately; rather, it is
“drawn down” (invested) as securities are identi ied and added to the
portfolio. Committed capital is usually drawn down over three to ive years, but
the drawdown period is at the discretion of the fund manager. Committed capital
that has not yet been drawn down is referred to as dry powder. The reason for
basing management fees on committed capital is that otherwise, the fund manager
would have an incentive to invest capital quickly instead of selectively.
Performance fees (also referred to as incentive fees) are a
portion of pro its on fund investments. Most often, the partnership agreement
will specify a hurdle rate (or preferred return) that must
be met or exceeded before any performance fees are paid. Hurdle rates can be de
ined in two ways: either “hard” or “soft.” If a soft hurdle rate is met, performance fees are
a percentage of the total increase in the value of each partner’s investment.
With a hard hurdle rate,
performance fees are based only on gains above the hurdle rate.
For example, consider a fund with a hurdle rate of 8% that
has produced a return of 12% for the year. We will use a performance fee
structure of 20% of gains. If the 8% is a soft hurdle rate, the performance fee
will be 20% of the entire 12%, or 2.4%. If the 8% is a hard hurdle rate, the
performance fee will be 20% of the gains above the hurdle rate (12% – 8% = 4%),
which would be 0.8%.
Typically, performance fees are paid at the end of each
year based on the increase in the value of fund investments, after management
fees and other charges, which may include consulting and monitoring fees that
are charged to individual portfolio companies.
A catch-up clause in a partnership agreement is based
on a hurdle rate and is similar in its effect to a soft hurdle rate. Consider a
fund with returns of 14%, a hurdle rate of 8%, and a 20% performance fee. A
catch-up clause would result in the irst 8% of gains going to the LPs and the
next 2% going to the GP, allowing the GP to “catch up” to receiving 20% of the
irst 10% of gains. After the catchup, further gains are split 80/20 between the
LPs and the GP.
Another feature that is often included is a high-water mark,
which means no performance fee is paid on gains that only offset prior losses.
Thus, performance fees are only paid to the extent that the current value of an
investor’s account is above the highest net-of-fees value previously recorded
(at the end of a payment period). This feature ensures that investors will not
be charged performance fees twice on the same gains in their portfolio values.
Because investors invest in a fund at different times, they each may have a
different high-water mark value.
A partnership’s waterfall
refers to the way in which payments are allocated to the GP and the LPs as pro
its and losses are realized on deals. With a deal-by-deal waterfall (or
American waterfall),
pro its are distributed as each fund investment is sold and shared according to
the partnership agreement. This favors the GP because performance fees are paid
before 100% of the LPs’ original investment plus the hurdle rate is returned to
them. With a whole-of-fund waterfall (or European waterfall), the LPs
receive all distributions until they have received 100% of their initial
investment plus the hurdle rate (typically after all fund investments have been
sold).
A clawback provision stipulates that if the GP accrues
or receives incentive payments on gains that are subsequently reversed as the
partnership exits deals, the LPs can recover previous (excess) incentive
payments. With a deal-by-deal waterfall, successful deals might be exited
initially, while losses are realized later. A clawback provision would allow
the LPs to recover these performance fees to the extent that the subsequent
losses negate prior gains on which performance fees had been paid.
MODULE
QUIZ 76.1
1. Compared with
alternative investments, traditional investments tend to:
A. be less liquid.
B. have lower
fees.
C. require more
specialized knowledge.
2. An investor who
wants to gain exposure to alternative investments but does not have the
in-house expertise to perform due diligence on individual deals is most likely to engage in:
A. co-investing.
B. fund investing.
C. direct
investing.
3. Management fees
for a private capital fund are determined as a percentage of:
A. invested
capital.
B. committed
capital.
C. assets under
management.
4. For an investor
in a private equity fund, the least
advantageous of the following limited partnership terms is a(n):
A. clawback
provision.
B. European-style
waterfall provision.
C. American-style
waterfall provision.
KEY CONCEPTS
LOS 76.a
Alternative investments comprise various types of
investments that do not fall under the heading of traditional investments.
Categories of alternative investments include the following:
Hedge
funds
Private capital (private equity and private debt)
Real assets (real estate, natural resources, and
infrastructure)
Alternative investments have relatively low correlations
with returns of traditional investments. Compared with traditional investments,
alternative investments typically require more specialized knowledge of
investment managers. Assets held tend to be less liquid, making alternative
investments appropriate for investors who have long time horizons and can
commit large amounts of capital.
LOS 76.b
Fund investing refers to pooling assets along with other
investors, using a fund manager that selects and manages investments according
to an agreed-upon strategy.
Co-investing refers to fund investing that includes the
right to invest additional capital directly alongside the fund manager.
Direct investing refers to purchasing assets independently,
rather than pooling funds with others or using a specialized outside manager.
LOS 76.c
Many alternative investments are structured as limited
partnerships, in which the GP is the fund manager and the LPs are the
investors. They are less regulated than publicly traded companies and are
typically only available to accredited investors. LPs may commit to an
investment amount and, in some cases, contribute only a portion of that
initially, providing the remaining funds over time as required by the GP.
Fees in alternative investment funds often consist of a
management fee and a performance fee. For hedge funds, management fees are a
percentage of assets under management. For private capital, management fees are
a percentage of committed capital rather than capital invested.
Performance fees are a portion of pro its on fund
investments. Typically, a hurdle rate must be exceeded before performance fees
are paid. With a soft hurdle rate, performance fees are based on the total
increase in the value of each partner’s investment. With a hard hurdle rate,
performance fees are based only on gains above the hurdle rate. A high-water
mark is a provision that no performance fees are paid on gains that only offset
prior losses.
A waterfall refers to the way payments are allocated to the
GP and the LPs. With a dealby-deal or American waterfall, pro its are
distributed as each fund investment is sold. With a whole-of-fund or European
waterfall, the LPs receive all distributions until they have received 100% of
their initial investment plus the hurdle rate.
With a clawback provision, if the GP receives incentive
payments on gains that are subsequently reversed, the LPs can recover excess
incentive payments.
ANSWER KEY FOR MODULE QUIZZES
Module Quiz 76.1
1. B Traditional investments typically have lower fees, require
less specialized knowledge by investment managers, and are more liquid than
alternative investments. (LOS 76.a)
2. B With fund investing, due diligence on the fund’s portfolio
investments is a responsibility of the fund manager rather than the fund
investors. Direct investing and co-investing require greater due diligence of
individual deals on the part of the investor. (LOS 76.b)
3. B For a private capital fund, management fees are a percentage
of committed capital rather than invested capital. For a hedge fund, management
fees are a percentage of assets under management. (LOS 76.c)
4. C An American-style waterfall structure has a deal-by-deal
calculation of incentive fees to the GP. In this case, a successful deal where
incentive fees are paid, followed by the sale of a holding that has losses in
the same year, can result in incentive fees greater than those calculated using
a European-style (whole-offund) waterfall. A clawback provision bene its the
limited partners by allowing them to recover performance fees paid earlier if
the fund realizes losses later. A clawback provision, coupled with an
American-style waterfall, will result in the same overall performance fees as a
European-style waterfall if the transactions occur in subsequent years. (LOS
76.c)
READING 77
ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENT
PERFORMANCE AND RETURNS
AND RETURN CALCULATIONS |
Video covering this content is |
LOS 77.a: Describe the performance appraisal of alternative investments. |
available
online. |
|
MODULE 77.1: PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
Alternative investments are typically exposed to greater
risks than unleveraged longonly traditional investments. These additional risks
arise from the following:
Timing
of cash lows over an investment’s life cycle
Use of leverage by fund managers
Valuation of investments that may or may
not have observable market prices Complexity of fees, taxes, and accounting
Ideally, returns on alternative investments should be
adjusted for these risks, although that may be dif icult in practice. It is
clear, however, that evaluating alternative investment returns (or expected
returns) without considering these additional risks would be naıv̈e and
possibly misleading.
Timing of Cash Flows
Alternative investments often have a life cycle that
exhibits three phases:
1. In the capital commitment phase,
a fund’s managers are identifying investments and making capital calls from the
partners. Recall that limited partners commit a stated amount of capital that
they will invest, but they do not necessarily deliver the entire amount
immediately in cash. Managers make capital calls as they identify investments
for which they require cash. Because of these cash out lows and the long-term
nature of the typical investments, returns tend to be negative during the
capital commitment phase.
2. During the capital deployment phase, the managers fund, and often involve themselves directly
in, the irms or projects in which they invest. Returns typically remain
negative in this phase, especially if the investments are in start-up companies
or troubled irms that the managers are attempting to turn around.
3. If the fund’s investments succeed and begin to generate income
and cash lows, the fund enters a capital distribution phase
during which its returns turn positive and accelerate.
A J-curve effect (illustrated in Figure 77.1) re
lects the norm of negative returns in the capital commitment phase, followed by
increasing returns in the capital deployment phase and maximum returns in the
capital distribution phase. Returns may reach a plateau toward the end of a
fund’s life as the managers exit any remaining investments.
Figure 77.1: J-Curve Example
Given the variability of cash lows over a fund’s life and
the importance of management decisions in the timing and magnitude of after-tax
cash lows, an IRR over the life of a fund is the most appropriate measure of
after-tax investment performance. (Recall from Quantitative Methods that a
money-weighted rate of return, which is an IRR, is appropriate when a manager
controls the timing of cash in lows and out lows.) A drawback to using IRRs is
that they rest on assumptions about the cost of capital for cash out lows and
the reinvestment rate for cash in lows.
A simpler measure of investment success is the multiple of invested capital
(or money multiple)—the ratio of total capital returned plus the
value of any remaining assets, to the total capital paid in over the life of
the investment. Because this measure does not consider the timing of cash in
lows and out lows, which can affect annual returns on invested capital signi
icantly, it can be considered somewhat naıv̈e.
Use of Leverage
Some alternative investments, particularly hedge funds, use
borrowing to magnify their gains (at the risk of magnifying losses). Hedge
funds may arrange margin inancing with prime brokers or employ leverage by
means of derivatives.
To state the effect of leverage on returns, consider a fund
that can invest the amount V0 without
leverage, and earn the rate of return r.
The fund’s unleveraged portfolio return (as a money amount) is simply this: r ×
V0. Now, let’s say this
fund can borrow the amount VB
at an interest rate of rB,
and earn r by investing the proceeds.
The fund’s leveraged portfolio return (again, as a money amount), after
subtracting the interest cost, then becomes:
Thus, stated as a
rate of return on the initial portfolio value of V0, the leveraged rate of return is as follows:
One of the reasons that funds use leverage is that some
strategies attempt to exploit relatively small pricing anomalies that might not
produce meaningful results without leverage. A risk from using leverage is that
a lender may issue margin calls if a fund’s equity position decreases below a
certain level. These can result in a fund having to realize losses by closing
positions or liquidating investments at unfavorable prices. If the fund must
sell a large position in a security, doing so may depress its price further.
Another important risk of funds that depends on leverage is that lenders may
limit their access to additional borrowing.
Valuation of Investments
As we have discussed, many alternative investments involve
illiquid assets that do not trade frequently in transparent markets. While
funds must recognize investments at fair value to comply with accounting
standards, fair value might rest on assumptions of which an investor in a fund
should be aware. A fair value hierarchy
groups these assumptions into the following three levels:
Level 1. The assets trade in active
markets and have quoted prices readily available, such as exchange-traded
securities.
Level 2. The assets do not have readily
available quoted prices, but they can be valued based on directly or indirectly
observable inputs, such as many derivatives that can be priced using models.
Level 3. The assets require unobservable
inputs to establish a fair value, such as real estate or private equity
investments, for which there have been few or no market transactions.
Particularly for Level 3 investments, the absence of market
activity can result in valuations that remain near their initial cost for long
periods. As a result, these values might not re lect the actual exit costs of
the investments. Importantly, this relative lack of change in fair values can
make reported returns for alternative investments appear higher, less risky,
and less correlated with traditional investments than they really are.
Fee Structures
In the next LOS, we will examine some of the effects on
investors’ returns of different fee speci ications, such as high-water marks,
hard or soft hurdle rates, and waterfall structures. Keep in mind that fee
structures are subject to negotiation (e.g., a limited partner might agree to a
higher management fee in exchange for fewer restrictions on redemptions) and
may differ depending on how early in a fund’s life cycle an investor commits
capital. Thus, different investors in the same fund might realize signi icantly
different returns.
LOS 77.b: Calculate and interpret alternative investment returns both before and after fees.
We have seen how margin calls may require a leveraged fund
to exit investments at unfavorable prices and unintended times. A similar risk
arises from investor redemptions.
The more negative a fund’s returns, the more likely investors are to ask the
manager to redeem their positions. For this reason, and because of the J-curve
effect of negative returns in the early years, alternative investment funds
(particularly hedge funds) typically take measures to restrict early
redemptions.
A lockup period is the time after initial
investment over which limited partners either cannot request redemptions or
incur signi icant fees for redemptions. A notice period (typically between 30 and
90 days) is the amount of time a fund has to ful ill a redemption request.
Notice periods allow time for managers to reduce positions in an orderly
manner. Fund managers often incur signi icant transactions costs when they
redeem shares. Redemption fees can offset these costs.
Managers may also have the discretion to implement a gate that restricts redemptions for a temporary period.
Investors should be aware that other investors may receive
terms that differ from those stated in the partnership agreement. Customized
fee structures are contained in side
letters with individual investors detailing how their terms differ from
those in the standard offering documents.
Although “2 and 20” and “1 and 10” were, at one time,
fairly standard fee structures for fund and fund-of-funds investments, these
fee structures continue to be under competitive pressure. Investors making
larger commitments can negotiate lower fees. There can also be a tradeoff
between liquidity provisions and fees. Investors can negotiate for lower fees
or better liquidity (shorter lockups and notice periods). Hurdle rates, hard
versus soft hurdles, and catch-up provisions may also be subject to
negotiation.
Early investors in a fund may also receive lower fees or
better liquidity terms as an incentive to invest at the fund’s inception. The
investment interests of early investors who receive such relatively better
terms are called founders class shares.
Annual investor fees can also be either-or fees, the
maximum of the management fee or the incentive fee. Under such a structure,
with a 1% management fee and a 30% incentive fee, investor fees each year would
simply be the management fee unless the calculated incentive fee is higher.
Such a structure may also stipulate that the 1% management fee be subtracted
from the incentive fee in a subsequent year.
Biases in Alternative Investment Returns
Numerous alternative investment indexes exist to measure
historical performance. However, they may not provide much meaningful
information on the asset class because each fund’s structure is unique, and the
funds that exist at any given time can be in widely different phases of their
life cycles. One way around this latter issue is to compare funds that
originated in the same vintage year.
The effect of survivorship bias is greater for a hedge fund
database than for other asset classes because by some estimates, more than 25%
of hedge funds fail in the irst three years of their existence. An index that
does not include failed funds will overstate the returns and understate the
risk of hedge funds as an asset class. These effects may be magni ied by back ill bias,
which occurs when managers only select their successful funds for inclusion in
indexes.
Return Calculations for Alternative Investments
Before-fee returns on alternative investments are
calculated the same way we calculate returns on any investment. The calculation
of holding period returns and periodic rates of return, both with and without
interim cash distributions, is described in Quantitative Methods and expanded
on by application in other topic areas.
Calculating after-fee returns simply
requires adjustment of the cash lows or values for the various fees involved,
typically management and performance fees. For a simple case in which
management fees are a ixed percentage of end-of-period assets and performance
fees are a ixed percentage of total return with no hurdle rate, we can state
the general partner’s total fees in money terms as follows:
This is the rate of return for an investor after fees:
Fee structure provisions, such as hurdle rates and
high-water marks, make calculating total fees more complex than this simple
formula. Other provisions may state whether the performance fee is net of the
management fee or independent of it, or whether the management fee is based on
beginning-of-period assets or end-of-period assets.
PROFESSOR’S NOTE
Because none of these provisions are standard across
alternative investment funds, exam questions that require calculations will
have to specify all of those that apply. Do not assume any provision applies
unless it is stated in the question.
Some examples will illustrate the application of various
fees and the relevant terminology.
EXAMPLE: Hedge fund fees
BJI Funds is a
hedge fund with a value of $110 million at initiation. BJI Funds charges a 2%
management fee based on assets under management at the beginning of the year
and a 20% performance fee with a 5% soft hurdle rate, and uses a high-water
BJI Funds is a
hedge fund with a value of $110 million at initiation. BJI Funds charges a 2%
management fee based on assets under management at the beginning of the year
and a 20% performance fee with a 5% soft hurdle rate, and uses a high-water
mark. Performance fees
are calculated on gains net of management fees. The yearend values before
fees are as follows: Year
1: $100.2 million Year 2: $119.0 million Calculate the total fees
and the investor’s after-fee return for both years. Answer: Year 1: Management fee: 110.0 million × 2% =
$2.2 million Return net of management fees: There is no performance
fee because the return after the management fee is less than the 5% hurdle
rate. Total fees: $2.2 million Ending value net of
fees: 100.2 million – $2.2 million = $98.0 million Year 1 after-fees return: Year 2: Management fee: 98.0 million × 2% =
$1.96 million Year-end value net of
management fee: $119.0 – $1.96 = $117.04
million The high-water mark is
$110 million. Year 2 value net of
management fee, above high-water mark: 117.04 million – 110.0
million = $7.04 million Year
2 return net of management fee, above high-water mark: Due to the high-water
mark, the performance fee is calculated based on gains in value above $110
million. The
performance fee is calculated on the entire gain above the high-water mark
because 6.4% is greater than the soft hurdle rate. If the 5% was a hard
hurdle rate, |
the performance fee would be calculated only on the
gains more than 5% above the high-water mark. Performance fee: 7.04 × 0.20 = $1.41
million Total fees: $1.96 million + $1.41 million = $3.37 million Year 2 year-end value
after fees: 119.0 – 3.37 = $115.63 million Year 2 after-fee return: |
EXAMPLE: Fund-of-funds An investor makes a total
investment of $60 million in a fund-of-funds that has a “1 and 10” fee
structure, with management and performance fees calculated independently
based on year-end values. Of the $60 million investment, $40 million is
allocated to the Alpha fund and $20 million is allocated to the Beta fund.
One year later, the value of the Alpha fund investment is $45 million, and
the value of the Beta fund investment is $28 million, both net of fund fees.
Calculate the investor’s return for the year net of fees. Answer: At year-end, the gross
value of the investor’s investment is $45 + $28 = $73 million. The fund-of-funds
management fee is 1% of $73 million, which is $0.73 million. The investor’s gain for the
year before fund-of-funds fees is $73 – $60 = $13 million. The fund-of-funds manager’s
performance fee is 10% of $13 million, which is $1.3 million. The year-end value of the investor’s fund-of-funds
investment is $73 – $0.73 – $1.3 = $70.97 million. |
EXAMPLE: Waterfall structure and clawback provision
A private
equity fund invests $100 million in a venture company that is sold for $130
million. The fund also invests $100 million in an LBO that goes poorly and is
liquidated for $80 million.
A private
equity fund invests $100 million in a venture company that is sold for $130
million. The fund also invests $100 million in an LBO that goes poorly and is
liquidated for $80 million.
1. If the carried interest performance fee for the GP is 20% and
there is no clawback provision, calculate the investor’s return after
performance fees, assuming the investment outcomes are realized in the same
year under the following: a. An American-style (deal-by-deal) waterfall
structure b. A European-style
(whole-of-fund) waterfall structure 2. How would the answers be affected if the venture investment
was sold in Year 1 and the LBO investment was sold in Year 2? 3. How would including a clawback provision affect investor
returns calculated in Question 1? Answer: 1. Under an American-style (deal-by-deal) waterfall structure, a
performance fee of 20% × ($130 – $100) = $6 million would be paid on the
venture investment. Because there is a loss on the LBO investment, no
performance fee is paid. Under
a European-style (whole-of-fund) waterfall structure, the gain for the period
is 130 + 80 – 200 = $10 million, and the performance fee is 20% × 10 = $2
million. 2. The European-style waterfall structure would have the same
overall return as the American-style structure, as the performance fee for
the venture investment of $6 million would be paid in Year 1 and no
performance fee would be received on the LBO investment. 3. With a clawback provision, after the LBO investment is sold,
the performance fee of $6 million paid on the venture investment is more than
20% of the return on the total investment. The fee is 60% of the total (net)
gain of $10 million. The investor could “claw back” $4 million of the $6
million paid as a performance fee on the venture investment, which would
reduce the total performance fee to 20% of the $10 million gain. |
MODULE
QUIZ 77.1
1. Returns to
investors in an alternative investment fund are most likely to be positive during its phase of capital:
A. distribution.
B. deployment.
C. commitment.
2. A hedge fund
has a return of 30% before fees in its first year. The fund has a management
fee of 1.5% on end-of-year fund value and a 15% incentive fee, with an 8% hard
hurdle rate on gains net of the management fee. The return after fees for an
investor in this fund is closest to:
A. 20.5%.
B. 21.5%.
C. 25.0%.
3. A private
equity fund has a “2 and 20” fee structure with the performance fee independent
of management fees. The fund will sell a holding for a profit of 9%. The hurdle
rate is specified as 8%. The provision that would result in an incentive fee of
1% is a:
A. hard hurdle
rate.
B. soft hurdle
rate.
C. catch-up
provision.
KEY CONCEPTS
LOS 77.a
Alternative investments are typically exposed to risks that
traditional investments are not, including timing of cash lows, use of
leverage, valuation assumptions for illiquid investments, and complex fee
structures and taxation.
Alternative investment returns typically exhibit a J-curve
effect: negative during the capital commitment phase, less negative during the
capital deployment phase, and positive during the capital distribution phase.
Because managers control cash in lows
and out lows, an IRR is appropriate for measuring returns. The multiple of
invested capital is a simpler measure that does not depend on the timing of
cash lows:
Assumptions underlying the fair value of assets can be
described by a three-level hierarchy:
Level 1.
Quoted prices readily available.
Level 2. Can be valued based on observable
inputs.
Level 3. Require unobservable inputs to establish
a fair value.
Fair values of Level 3 assets might be updated infrequently
due to a lack of market activity. This can bias return measures upward and risk
measures downward.
LOS 77.b
Before-fee returns on alternative investments are
calculated the same way we calculate fees on any investment. Calculating
after-fee returns requires us to adjust the cash lows or values for the various
fees involved (typically management and performance fees), and for speci
ications such as hurdle rates and high-water marks.
ANSWER KEY FOR MODULE QUIZZES
Module Quiz 77.1
1. A A successful fund is most likely to generate positive returns
in its capital distribution phase. (LOS 77.a)
2. C This is easiest to see using an initial investment amount of
100.
Year-end gross value = 100 × 1.30 = 130
Management fee = 1.5% × 130 = 1.95
Gains net of management fee = 30 – 1.95 = 28.05
Hurdle gains = 8% × 100 = 8
Incentive fee = 15% × (30 – 1.95 –
8) = 3.0075 Total fees = 1.95 + 3.0075 = 4.9575
Ending value after fees = 130 – 4.9575 = 125.0425
Return after fees = 125.0425 / 100
– 1 = 25.0425% (LOS 77.b)
3. C With a catch-up provision, the limited partners receive the
irst 8% of gross return, and the general partner gets all returns above that to
a maximum of 2%. Gains above that are shared 80% to the limited partners and
20% to the general partner.
With a soft hurdle rate of 8%, the performance fee would
be 20% of 9%, or 1.8%.
With a hard hurdle rate of 8%, the performance fee would be
20% of (9% – 8%), or 0.2%. (LOS 77.b)
READING 78
INVESTMENTS IN PRIVATE
CAPITAL: EQUITY AND DEBT
|
|
LOS 78.a: Explain features of private equity and its investment characteristics. |
Video covering this content is
available online. |
MODULE 78.1: PRIVATE CAPITAL
Private capital is the funding provided to
companies that is not raised from the public markets. Private capital includes
private equity and private debt.
Private equity is equity capital raised
from sources other than the public markets. Private equity funds usually invest
in private companies or public companies that they plan to take private
(leveraged buyout funds) or in early in companies’ lives (venture capital funds).
The companies in which a private equity fund invests are called its portfolio companies.
Private Equity Investment Categories
A popular type of private equity fund is the leveraged buyout (LBO) fund, which acquires public
companies with a large percentage of the purchase price inanced by debt. LBOs
are a way for a company to “go private” because after the transaction, the
target company’s stock is no longer publicly traded.
In an LBO, the private equity irm seeks to add value by
improving or restructuring the portfolio company’s operations to increase its
sales, pro its, and cash lows. The cash lows can then be used to service and
pay down the debt taken to fund the acquisition.
Two of the various types of LBOs are management buyouts (MBOs), in which the portfolio
company’s existing management team participates in the purchase, and management buy-ins (MBIs), in which the private
equity manager replaces the portfolio company’s current management team with a
new team.
Venture capital (VC)
funds provide inancing to companies in the early stages of their development.
VC funds typically receive common equity interest in the portfolio companies,
but they may also get convertible debt or convertible preferred stock.
Convertible securities help to align the interests of the VC investors and the
start-up irm, in that both want to increase the value of the irm, but give the
VC investors a higher priority of claims in the event of liquidation.
VC investment involves a high level of risk, but the returns
can be substantial. VC investors are actively involved in developing their
portfolio companies, often sitting on the boards or illing key management
roles.
We can classify VC investments by the portfolio company’s
stage of development:
1. The formative stage refers to investments made during a
irm’s earliest period and comprises three different phases:
– Pre-seed capital or angel investing
is the capital provided at the idea stage. The investment funds are used for business
plans and assessing market potential. The amount of inancing is usually small,
coming from individuals (“angels”) rather than VC funds.
– Seed-stage inancing or seed capital
generally supports product development, marketing, and market research. This is
the irst stage at which VC funds usually invest.
– Early-stage inancing or start-up stage inancing refers to investments made to
fund operations in the lead-up to production and sales.
2. Later-stage inancing or expansion venture capital comes after production and
sales have begun. Investment funds provided at this stage are used to support
initial growth, expansion, product improvement, or marketing. In this stage,
the owners (typically the founders and managers of the company) often sell
control of the company to VC investors.
3. Mezzanine-stage inancing refers to capital
provided to prepare the irm for an initial public offering (IPO). The term mezzanine stage
is used to indicate the timing of the inancing rather than the method. A
similar term, mezzanine inancing, refers to hybrids of
equity and debt, such as convertible securities. Mezzanine-stage inancing can
use these, but more often, it consists of equity or short-term debt.
A private equity irm that engages in minority equity investing buys a
less-thancontrolling interest in public companies that are looking for capital
with which to expand. One way it can make such investments is through a private investment in public equity (PIPE), a private offering to
institutional investors that allows a publicly traded irm to raise capital more
quickly and cost effectively than a public offering, with fewer disclosures and
lower transaction costs.
Private Equity Exit Strategies
Private equity irms typically add value to young companies,
then sell them, with an average holding period of ive years. Funds have several
methods of exiting an investment in a portfolio company:
1. Trade sale. Sell a portion of the private
company to a strategic buyer via direct sale or auction. An advantage of a
trade sale is that the strategic investor typically pays a premium to realize
synergies with an existing business. Advantages compared with an IPO include
faster execution and lower transaction costs. Disadvantages of a trade sale
include potential resistance from the portfolio company’s management and
employees, as well as a limited universe of potential buyers.
2. Public listing. Listing on a stock exchange
can take place through an IPO, a direct listing, or a special purpose
acquisition company:
– IPOs are the most common method of public listing, using
investment banks to underwrite theoffering. Compared to other methods, IPOs
typically realize a higher price for the portfolio company. They may also
improve its visibility to investors and the public, which can be positive for the
value of shares that the private equity fund retains. However, IPOs involve
high transaction and compliance costs and might not always be received
favorably by the investing public. Portfolio companies best suited for exit via
IPO are large irms in growing industries that have stable inances and clear
strategies.
– A less frequently used alternative to an IPO is a direct listing,
in which the stock of the company is loated on the public market directly
without underwriters. This decreases the cost of the transaction, but does not
raise new capital for the portfolio company.
– A special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) is an entity (sometimes
referred to as a blank check company) set up solely to raise capital that it
will use to acquire an unspeci ied private company within a stated time period;
otherwise, it must return the capital to investors. This method can be more
lexible than an IPO and reduce the uncertainty about the valuation of the
portfolio company, as well as provide access to investors who transact
regularly with the sponsors. However, SPACs have numerous disadvantages,
including dilutive effects from SPAC shares and warrants, a spread between the
value of the SPAC and the value of the acquired company, deal risk in the
acquisition, and stockholder overhang from SPAC shareholders
selling shares after the acquisition is announced. Scrutiny from securities
regulators is also increasing.
3. Recapitalization. The
company issues debt to fund a dividend distribution to equity holders. This is
not an exit, in that the fund still controls the company, but a
recapitalization allows the private equity fund to extract money from the
company to pay its investors.
4. Secondary sale. Sell a portfolio company to
another private equity irm or a group of investors.
5. Write-off/liquidation.
Reassess and take losses from an unsuccessful investment in a portfolio
company.
Risk and Return From Private Equity Investments
Empirical evidence shows that returns
on private equity funds have been higher on average than overall stock returns.
However, the standard deviation of private equity returns has been higher than
the standard deviation of equity index returns, suggesting higher risk,
including illiquidity and leverage risks. Furthermore, private equity indexes
typically rely on self-reporting and are subject to survivorship and back ill
biases, both of which lead to overstated returns. Because portfolio companies
are revalued infrequently, measures of volatility and correlation with other
investments may be biased downward.
LOS 78.b: Explain features of private debt and its investment characteristics.
Private debt refers to various forms of
debt provided by investors directly to private entities. Categories of private
debt include the following:
1. Direct lending refers to loans made directly
to a private company without an intermediary. The debt is typically senior and
secured, with covenants to protect the lender. A leveraged loan is a
loan made by a private debt fund using money borrowed from other sources. That
is, the fund’s portfolio of loans is leveraged to magnify returns.
2. Venture debt is funding that provides VC backing
to start-up or early-stage irms that are not yet pro itable. Venture debt is
often convertible to stock or combined with warrants. Managers of young
companies may favor venture debt because it allows them to maintain ownership
and control.
3. Mezzanine debt is private debt that is
subordinated to senior secured debt. Mezzanine debt may have special features,
such as conversion rights or warrants, to compensate investors for additional
risk.
4. Distressed debt is the debt of mature
companies in inancial trouble, such as bankruptcy or default. In many cases, the
fund becomes active in restructuring the existing debt or making other changes
that increase the value of the acquired debt. Some distressed debt investors
specialize in identifying otherwise good companies with temporary cash low
problems, anticipating that the value of the company and its debt will recover.
Others focus on turnaround situations, acquiring a company’s debt with an
intent to be active in managing and restructuring the company.
5. Unitranche debt combines different classes of
debt (secured and unsecured) into a single loan with an interest rate that re
lects the blend of debt classes. The resulting debt typically ranks between
senior and subordinated debt.
Private debt investments typically provide a higher rate of
return relative to traditional bonds to compensate investors for higher risk
and a lack of liquidity. Investors may also bene it from increased portfolio
diversi ication because private debt returns have relatively low correlations
with other traditional investments.
The interest rate of private debt is usually set relative
to a reference rate, such as the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR).
Therefore, the rate changes when the reference rate luctuates due to changes to
the interest rate environment.
The potential for higher returns of
private debt is associated with higher risk, including illiquidity and default
risk. Private debt investing requires specialized knowledge about the structure
of the debt, the borrower’s life cycle phase, and the features of the
underlying assets for secured lending. Senior private debt has less risk and
steadier yields than private mezzanine debt, but mezzanine debt offers greater
upside potential.
LOS 78.c: Describe the diversi ication bene its that private capital can provide.
Private capital investments can provide some diversi
ication bene it to a portfolio of traditional investments. Empirical evidence
indicates that correlations of private capital fund index returns with public
market index returns range from 0.63 to 0.83.1
Each private equity fund has a vintage year, which
is the year the fund made its irst investment. The performance of a fund is
greatly in luenced by its vintage year and the phase of the business cycle in
that year. Funds that begin investing during a business cycle expansion are
likely to earn higher rates of return if they specialize in early-stage
companies. Funds that begin investing during business cycle contractions are
likely to earn higher rates of return if they specialize in distressed
companies. Investors in private capital should diversify across vintage years.
Risk and return pro iles vary among categories of private
capital. Private equity has the highest risk and return, followed by mezzanine
debt, unitranche debt, senior direct lending, senior real estate debt, and
infrastructure debt.
MODULE
QUIZ 78.1
1. In which stage
of a firm’s development is a venture capital fund most likely to make its initial investment?
A. Start-up.
B. Seed capital.
C. Angel
investing.
2. In a secondary
sale, a private capital firm sells one of its portfolio companies to:
A. the public.
B. a competitor in
its industry.
C. another private
capital fund.
3. Unitranche debt
is best described as:
A. combining
different classes of debt into a single loan.
B. having special
features, such as conversion rights or warrants.
C. a loan made by
a private debt fund using money borrowed from other sources.
4. Which type of
private capital fund is most likely
to earn excess returns over its life if its vintage year took place during an
economic contraction?
A. Venture capital
fund. B. Distressed debt fund.
C. Leveraged
buyout fund.
KEY CONCEPTS
LOS 78.a
Private equity funds usually invest in the equity of
private companies or companies wanting to become private, often inancing their
assets with high levels of debt:
Venture capital funds provide capital to
companies early in their development. Stages of venture capital investing
include the formative stage (composed of the angel investing, seed, and early
stages), the later stage (expansion), and the mezzanine stage (prepare for
IPO).
Leveraged buyouts include management buyouts,
in which the existing management team is involved in the purchase, and
management buy-ins, in which an external management team replaces the existing
management.
Developmental capital or minority equity
investing refers to providing capital for business growth or restructuring. The
irms inanced may be public or private. In the case of public companies, such
inancing is referred to as a private investment in public equity.
Methods for exiting investments in portfolio companies
include trade sale (sell to a competitor or another strategic buyer), IPO (sell
some or all shares to investors), recapitalization (issue portfolio company
debt), secondary sale (sell to another private equity irm or other investors),
or write-off/liquidation.
LOS 78.b
Private debt refers to lending to private entities. Private
debt investments include direct lending, venture debt, mezzanine loans,
distressed debt, and unitranche debt. Private debt investing requires
specialized knowledge about the structure of the debt, the borrower’s life
cycle phase, and the features of the underlying assets.
LOS 78.c
Private capital investments can provide some diversi
ication bene it to a portfolio of traditional investments because their
correlations of returns with traditional investments are relatively low.
Investors in private capital should diversify across
vintage years. Funds that begin investing during a business cycle expansion are
likely to earn higher rates of return if they specialize in early-stage
companies. Funds that begin investing during business cycle contractions are
likely to earn higher rates of return if they specialize in distressed
companies.
ANSWER KEY FOR MODULE QUIZZES
Module Quiz 78.1
1. B VC funds typically make their initial investments during a
irm’s seed stage for product development, marketing, and market research. At
the angel investing stage, the funding source is usually individuals rather
than VC funds. The start-up stage or early stage follows the seed stage and
refers to investments made to fund initial commercial production and sales. (LOS
78.a)
2. C In a secondary sale, a private capital irm sells one of its
portfolio companies to another private capital fund or group of private
investors. Selling a portfolio company to a competitor in its industry is known
as a trade sale. Selling a portfolio company to the public requires an IPO.
(LOS 78.a)
3. A Unitranche debt refers to combining different classes of debt
into a single loan with an interest rate that re lects the blend of debt
classes. (LOS 78.b)
4. B Funds with vintage years during contractions are likely to
earn higher rates of return if they specialize in distressed companies. Funds
with vintage years during expansions are likely to earn higher rates of return
if they specialize in earlystage companies. (LOS 78.c)
1 Preqin, annualized quarterly return of Private Capital Quarterly Index rebased to December 31, 2007.
Comments
Post a Comment